Wednesday, February 29, 2012

No Cost Mortgage Refinance | Sunk Costs Are Irrelevant

I last refinanced my mortgage in July 2010. ?Back then I was trying to reduce my rate from 5% AND get out of escrow. ?I was extremely successful and garnered a nice 4.375% 30 year fixed mortgage. ?I thought I was done, but rates continued to fall. ?I started playing with a mortgage calculator and realized I could probably save another $25k over the life of the loan if I refinanced. ?That kind of money is worth a shot. ?

Like a lot of people right now, I don't consider myself cash rich right now so I don't want to have to bring money to another closing. ?Thus, I decided to go the route of a no cost mortgage refinance. ?Now, if it were truly no cost, everyone would do it. ?In a no cost refinance you end up sacrificing a little bit on the interest rate side to avoid having to pay anything at closing. ?If you can pay the closing costs, you probably should because your rate will be better, and you'll end paying far less over the life of the loan. ?You can use the exact same process described here. ?The only difference is you will be paying ~1-2% of the cost of the loan at the closing. ?

Warning: ?Long post follows

I kept the following diary as I went through the process for my new mortgage:

  • Monday morning, 1/9 ? Emailed mortgage broker (the same mortgage broker I've used in the past) to see what rate I could get if I wanted to refinance at no cost. He said the best that he could see was 4.125%. ?I said I was hoping for 4%, and that I would just wait and see over the next few weeks or months if it would drop since my rate was already good.
  • Monday afternoon 1/9 ? Broker calls me. ?Rates fell during the day. ?4% is available. ?Serendipity? ?I run upstairs for a short conference with DW and then call the broker back. ?We talk about recent sales in my neighborhood likely to bring down my home's appraisal which could put the 80% LTV in jeopardy in spite of my diligent overpaying of my mortgage to get my equity higher. ?If I don't get the 80% LTV, I would either have to bring money to the closing to make up the difference or walk away and lose the money I spent on the appraisal. ?It's a risk I'm willing to take. ?I pay $375 at that point for a new appraisal. ??This is the only sunk cost in this investment strategy aside from my time. ?I tell my broker I want the same deal as last time with all costs wrapped into the mortgage and no escrow or pre-payment penalties. ?He takes this information and begins arranging for an appraisal.
  • Tuesday afternoon 1/10 ? Mark, an appraiser calls me to schedule the appraisal for Friday 1/13 at noon. ?I dig through emails and come up with my old appraisal from a year and a half ago to hand to Mark when he comes. ?This will make his job easier because it is a recent appraisal, and more importantly the previous valuation will psychologically serve as an anchor for his thinking. ?This is important because it is $408,000. ?If you read my net worth posts, you know this is not even close to what sites like Zillow think about my house. ?I detailed this Zillow effect last May, and it continues.
  • Wednesday afternoon 1/11 ? The broker's assistant sent me all the loan documents to review and sign as well as a list of the needed materials to complete the application (copy of driver's license, 2 most recent paystubs, W2, 2 most recent bank statements, and some clarifications around recent credit inquiries). ?This is by far the most tedious part, but if you already have your personal financial life organized, it's not too much of a pain.
  • Friday 12pm 1/13 ? Mark, the appraiser, showed up on-time. ?The weather was cold, and he was outside trying to do the external measurements on my house. ?I walked out with a copy of my 2010 appraisal in hand and gave it to him. ?You could see the delight in his eyes and his effusive thanks told me were headed in the right direction. ?I showed him around the interior and emphasized all the positive changes we'd made in the home. ?Luckily I had scheduled our maid service for that morning so the house was spotless. ?I really hate how much appearances matter, but I know they do. ?Note, I was explicit with him about what I thought were good comps for my home AND I told him I needed to come in at $375,000 or above to get my refinance to work properly. ?I think a lot of people don't bother to do this or feel uncomfortable, but these guys have lots of wiggle room and it helps if you can guide them to the number that will make you a satisfied (and possibly repeat) customer.
  • Monday 1/16 ? DW and I get all the paperwork together, sign all the documents, and fax it to my mortgage broker. ?We receive confirmation of receipt and that we'll be using a local real estate attorney for the closing ? meeting him at my broker's office.
  • Thursday 1/19 ? My broker sent over a copy of my appraisal. ?I opened it with fingers crossed. ?Well, wadda ya know? ?It's $375,000. ?The exact number I told the appraiser I needed. ?Either I am shockingly prescient with my ability to forecast real estate values or I lead him down a path. ?I'll let you decide. ?Make the system work for you. ?As a result of this good news my broker sent the loan off for underwriting. ?This typically takes a few days. ?Also, the insurer for our home owner's policy called to make sure it was OK to give information to our broker.
  • Friday 1/20 ? I called US Bank, the holder of my current mortgage, this morning because I saw an article on Yahoo saying rates had fallen again. ?I told them explicitly that I was in the process of refinancing, and that they were likely going to lose my business, but this was their chance to keep me. ?Honestly, I should have done this from the start probably. ?I just didn't even think of it because I'm so used to going through my broker. ?I learned from the nice CSR that although I had just done an appraisal, they would have to order another one no matter what. ?Ridiculous, right? ?That's another $400 in costs that would have to be offset by the rate. ?However, the best no cost option she could offer was at 4.125%. ?I thanked her for her time and finally started to relax into the idea that 4% is a good rate and just maybe I can stop angling for something better.
  • Tuesday 1/24 ? I was notified by email from my mortgage broker that we have initial approval from the underwriters and that there is no additional information necessary from me. ?A very positive sign and great that I don't have to any more legwork.
  • Tuesday 1/31 ? We've reached the stage where we need to schedule the closing. ?We're trying to land on a date about 3 weeks out to insure all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed.
  • Tuesday 2/7 ? We're all set. ?I confirmed the closing for 3pm on 2/24 working with the lawyer and my broker. ?Closing will be at the broker's office to facilitate any last minute clarifications.
  • Friday 2/10 ? I was instructed by my mortgage broker to go to RBC (now PNC) to close my HELOC. ?The last time we re-financed, my broker set this up for me as safety net of sorts. ?In uncertain times when DW was really sick and my job felt in jeopardy due to the merger, this served as insurance. ?I was really happy with it until this year they charged a $50 fee for having the account. ?I of course fought them on it, but the fee was buried in the paperwork details. ?I didn't like it, but I paid it because I liked the security it gave me. ?I ended up never needing a penny of it which was a blessing. ?Fast forward to Friday and when I go to close it (and my checking and my safety deposit box), RBC wants to CHARGE ANOTHER FEE OF $250 because I was closing it within 3 years. ?Are you kidding me? ?Russell, who was helping me, understood the absurdity. ?He said he would work with my broker to subordinate the HELOC until year 3 when it could be closed at no cost. ?However, wouldn't that still leave me with a $50 annual fee? ?Again, Russell said he would work it out with my broker because he had to do this sort of thing all the time to get around RBC's ridiculous fee structure. ?I liked Russell. ?he was competent and I kind of felt bad for him taking all of my money out, but there's no way I will ever do business with them again. ?I gave him my broker's info and left.
  • Wednesday 2/15 ? I got an email from my broker. ?It turns out if we subordinate the HELOC then my rate would go up and RBC won't budge on the fee so my broker is going to cover the $250. ?Now, I know mortgage brokers are not able to actually "eat costs" without breaking RESPA rules so I'll be curious to see where my $250 'discount' comes into the equation. ?He's a nice guy, and it really is the right thing to do since he set me up at that bank in the first place, but I think the really interesting part here is the short-sightedness of RBC. ?Here you have a mortgage broker who can push his clients to get their HELOC's virtually anywhere he likes, and RBC is going to nickel and dime him over one fee for one client. ?That is stupid beyond belief but so typical of many big banks today. ?I'm so glad to be completely done with RBC. ?
  • Friday 2/24 ? Apparently I should be allowed to arrange everything for a mortgage refinance except for figuring out the directions on how to get to closing since I managed to mess that up twice. ?We eventually made it to my broker's office and sat down with the attorney. ?We went over the most relevant details, fixed the misspelling of DW's name, and signed our names dozens of times. ?We were done in under an hour, and it was great to have both our broker and our attorney in the room to answer questions. ?Definitely try to work it that way if you can. ?Our new lender is Freddie Mac unless they decide to sell it another bank to service the loan which is quite common. ?We are going to end up getting about $800 back which will just about cover the last bit I need to fully fund the 2011 Roth IRA's. ?Also, we'll end up skipping our March payment due to the timing of everything so it will feel like we have even more money. ?I'm debating whether to throw that at the mortgage right away or use it for the 2012 Roth's. ?Once the dust settles I'll be opening a new HELOC (one with no fees!) at First National Bank. ?It's already all arranged.

So about 1.5 months and few hours of legwork and paperwork later, I'm the proud owner of the exact same home I already live in! ?Only now I'm going to save about $38,739 more dollars on the cost of that home over the mortgage period (assuming no pre-payment). ?It will actually be more since I can pre-pay even more principle. ?However, with an effective tax rate of 2.88%, I may forego pre-payment for other investments. ?Lots of decisions, but what's not to like!

I'm happy to take any questions.

Comments

Source: http://sunkcostsareirrelevant.com/2012/02/no-cost-mortgage-refinance-diary/

htc flyer review westboro stevejobs stevejobs steve jobs commencement speech sarah palin espn body issue

If a Bird Chirps in Your YouTube Video, Are You Committing Copyright Infringement? [Video]

A harmless British hippie shot a video about something boring like making a salad from wild greens, and then uploaded it to YouTube. Shortly after, he was informed by YouTube that he was infringing on the copyrights of Rumblefish. The problem is, there's no music in the clip. At all. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/1PjaLYUfn8I/if-a-bird-is-chirping-in-the-back-of-your-youtube-video-youre-committing-copyright-infringement

tilt do a barrel roll. fsu football fsu football do a barrelroll bérénice marlohe bérénice marlohe

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

92% Beauty and the Beast

All Critics (84) | Top Critics (24) | Fresh (84) | Rotten (7) | DVD (36)

The greatest animated film ever made and one of the screen's great musicals hardly needs this (3D) sort of sprucing up.

What you gain in an extra, faked dimension you lose in lively, genuine beauty.

The set pieces are narcotically pleasing, especially the Busby Berkeley-style dancing-kitchenware spectacular, "Be Our Guest," and the romantic ballroom centerpiece that brings Beauty and her Beast together.

The 3-D pops out to enhance the drama or energy of scenes in which settings are large and integral to the action.

Some youthful memories are better not revisited, but this definitely isn't one of them. Sometimes you can go home again.

It is a surprise, in a time of sequels and retreads, that the new film is so fresh and altogether triumphant in its own right.

I admit it: I wrote this more than 20 years ago. But, like " Beauty and the Beast" itself, I think it stands the test of time.

Disney, please understand ... what people are actually showing up for ... they just want to see classic Disney on the big screen. The 3D is incidental.

Disney's gorgeous 1991 animated version of the classic fairy tale "Beauty and the Beast" gets the same 3D treatment that was recently given to "The Lion King."

Watching this in a theater definitely makes it feel less like a "cartoon" and more like a significant film. Cogsworth poking Le Fou in the butt with a sword aside.

One of the brightest jewels in Disney's crown, Beauty and the Beast's 3D reissue takes nothing away and makes the film's brilliance even easier to appreciate; the movie is more beautiful and timeless than it ever was.

Beauty and the Beast is just as enchanting 20 years after its initial release.

The apex of an art form, a justly celebrated classic, and the best animated movie of any sort ever put on screen at any time.

The lines have begun to show in Belle's tale, which remains enjoyable but feels more like a quaint artifact than the masterpiece it once was declared to be.

Both TANGLED EVER AFTER and BEAUTY AND THE BEAST are sure to enthrall audiences everywhere, even if the 3D doesn't really add much of anything to this animated classic.

A serviceable version of a classic fairy tale minus that crucial touch of magic.

And it is a joy to revisit the timeless pleasures of traditional Disney storytelling, with no attempts to add sizzle from celebrity voice talent or radio-friendly pop songs.

3D doesn't downplay the inherent artistry of the effort, but it doesn't enhance anything outside of ticket prices.

Beauty and the Beast looks beautiful and is sure to entertain, but this experience is superfluous at best-it was already a three-dimensional story long before these new technics.

Better remembered than seen, Beauty and the Beast has been treated unkindly not just by the years that have passed since it was released to enormous acclaim in 1991, but by a faddish 3D conversion.

More Critic Reviews

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/beauty_and_the_beast_1991/

free pancakes at ihop nascar daytona 500 winner dwts cleveland plain dealer dancing with the stars tyler clementi

The Ladies Love The Crocs - Shopping and Product Reviews

<desk border=?0? cellspacing=?0? cellpadding=?0? width=?100%? top=?1?> peak=?18?>
height=?18?>volume=?2?>Hey ladies, do you would like to grab a pair of footwear which not only give the ft quiet and make them feel great but give you fashion as well. Then crocs are certainly made for you. Crocs are the suitable and finest preference for all the women in town. Whether you are looking for clogs or sandals, flip-flop or foot fetishes, crocs satisfies all the demands.

size=?2?>From seaside shoes to professional wear to informal put on, crocs always present you an ideal package. Crocs footwear are ideal due to their designs, colours, comfort and style. They join in quite a few hues so you can choose the one depending on your wish or it is easy to choose many hues to match up the suits.

size=?2?>Seaside or nile are greatest at the seaside facet. Beach footwear are sandals although niles are the stunning mixture between block and flip-flop. These folks give you the out a lot fun and you get pleasure from at the seashore side with your footwear getting no complaints. If you would want to save on these attractive footwear, check for the coupon for crocs at any online coupon sites.

size=?2?>You can choose aspen or home if you are at work and Athens and scutes once you are at home. If you are looking for foot fetishes afterwards georgie is the proper alternative.

size=?2?>Whether or not you are at function or home, enjoying at beach or in the park, it is easy to be creative by utilizing crocs. After all your ft also have correct to enjoy. Supreme fun and relaxation can solely be taken if your ft are in crocs because solely crocs full money back guarantee the level of comfy that your ft want.

volume=?2?>You will not only feel unwind and easy but you will glance fashionable and trendy too. Females often search out the combination of attraction and cozy in footwear. Crocs are the answer of all your thoughts and desires. You can glance gorgeous without any sending pain to the feet. Get inclined to get pleasure from the fun of crocs by ordering your pair of footwear now. Don?t forget to find some crocs coupons to conserve on these good footwear.

desk>

Source: http://shoppingandproductreviews.net/the-ladies-love-the-crocs/

republican candidates virginia tech mike martz hokies quadrantid norv turner jerry angelo

Why Registry Clean-up is important to support councils - Technology

Article

by James Madison

If computers get slower and slower beat most computer users repair expert to get a registry cleaner utility and clean or change registry settings. Is it really necessary? If so, where to get a good registry cleaner to speed recovery system effective? Let us find, experts recommend the online technical support.

Remote computer support professionals offer expert advice to help users better compatible computer repair and maintenance tool to find a better price. Therefore, it is always advisable to ask a remote PC to any recovery process expert system. A slow computer is the most boring, is not only frustrated user n, but also delays the important work that can actually be done minutes. According to computer repair specialists, there are several reasons why a computer is running slow. They also suggest several possibilities, solutions, from which a change in the registry files from the computer. This may sound a little geeky, but according to their directions and simple instructions that anyone can perform the task smoothly. So what is it? Computer with the operating system Microsoft Windows operating system has a registry, which is, in other words, the main controller system. Registry on each user is used to open a program. PC has immediate access to the registry to determine the position of said program file on your system. Now, the registry will belong together by several types of files, system settings and reference value. Here, the reference value term means that information to provide the Windows operating system management for proper operation. Database record is used as storage for the external interfaces and other hardware components of the system. Tech support specialists help you find users to program files, user profiles and other parameters in the system registry. But now you must have understood the importance and need is for recording. Spilled over regular access to registry settings too. And that?s the main reason why computers find it difficult to locate the required file and takes longer than the normal response to an event. The computer freezes and crashes sometimes even the operating system. It can also be the reason for Web pages that may be too long to make loading. Thus, according to technical support experts, it is important to clean and rebuild clutters registry settings. This is a very easy task to complete, as long as you know how it goes. But most important, even a few small errors have serious consequences. So it is better if you do so under the supervision of experts. online computer repair professional registry cleaning utilities, sometimes for free. These third party software applications to work reliably clan registry and modify the settings according to user needs. However, it is always important to create a system restore point, and even better, a complete record to be back on the safe side. You can be a remote support tech-talk, if you want to perform the task manually.

Source: http://amuir.org/why-registry-clean-up-is-important-to-support-councils/

occupy los angeles occupy los angeles comedian patrice o neal occupy philadelphia occupy philadelphia conrad murray conrad murray

Monday, February 6, 2012

Cheap Auto Racing Tickets - Submit Link Web Directory

Barries Water and Winter Sports Gear
Barries Water and Winter Sports Gear

Dealer of Alpine Skis, Atomic and Burton snowboards, Hyperlite and Liquid Force Wakeboards, HO Sports water skis and tubes, Nautique boats, summer and winter sports equipment, ...

http://www.barriessports.com
Extreme Freeride Coimbra
Extreme Freeride Coimbra

Todo sobre a vertente downhill/freeride. Imagens, videos e noticias actualizadas 24h. O portal do ciclismo. O Portal do Downhill ...

http://www.freeridecoimbra.com
Mickie James
Mickie James

A fan site dedicated to the WWE Diva Mickie James. This is the place where you get latest pictures of wwe divas Mickie James, mickie james ...

http://www.mickie-james.co.cc
Your Serve Tennis Shop
Your Serve Tennis Shop

Online tennis shop offering a great selection of tennis merchandise at great prices. Items include tennis rackets, tennis apparel, tennis tickets, tennis bags and more. ...

http://your-serve-tennis-shop.com
Softball Bats For Sale
Softball Bats For Sale

We have all of your favorite fastpitch softball bats - DeMarini, Miken, Rawlings, Easton, Anderson and Worth. In addition to fastpitch softball bats, we also have ...

http://www.buy-softball-bats.com
Best scuba diving resource
Best scuba diving resource

This is a website for the avid scuba diving enthusiast who wants to know and find the best places, deals & lessons to fulfill their passion ...

http://www.bestscubadivingresource.com
Billiard Supplies
Billiard Supplies

Monster Break Billiards has the largest selection of pool cues, cue cases, and billiard supplies on the internet. With a complete line of products available for ...

http://www.monsterbreakbilliards.com
Bowmen of Skelmersdale
Bowmen of Skelmersdale

Target archery club based in Skelmersdale Lancashire ...

http://www.bowmenofskelmersdale.co.uk

Source: http://www.submit-link.eu/link/8695/Cheap-Auto-Racing-Tickets

jacqueline kennedy jacqueline kennedy jackie o john kennedy jr john kennedy jr machine gun preacher machine gun preacher

Sunday, February 5, 2012

www.leukemia-lymphoma.us - Leukemia Lymphoma Cancer Stats

Here's our Bot Verdict for your site:

http://leukemia-lymphoma.us

Directory Info

  • Dmoz Directory:
  • Yahoo Directory

Alexa

leukemia-lymphoma.us

Compete

leukemia-lymphoma.us

Backlinks

  • Yahoo Backlink:
  • Inbound Link:
  • Outbound Link:
  • Altavista Backlink:
  • AllTheWeb Backlink:

Website Evaulation

  • Website Worth:
  • Daily Pageview:
  • Daily Earning:
  • Alexa Rank:

Website Server Data

  • IP Address:
  • Country:
  • Loading Time:
  • Website Age:

Results

  • 216.172.190.32
  • United States
  • 7.00950622559E-5
  • 0 years 12 days

Site Info

  • Title:
  • Keywords:
  • Description:

?

  • leukemia-lymphoma.us - Leukemia Lymphoma Cancer
  • leukemia-lymphoma.us
  • Lymphoma Leukemia Cancer Information Read About Symptoms Prognosis Treatment

Website Whois

Loading Please Wait...

Source: http://www.websitevaluebot.com/www.leukemia-lymphoma.us

lesean mccoy while you were sleeping while you were sleeping happy halloween happy halloween history of halloween eagles cowboys

Unlike Patriots, NFL slow to embrace 'Moneyball'

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, left, talks with head coach Bill Belichick during practice on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, left, talks with head coach Bill Belichick during practice on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick, right, talks with kicker Stephen Gostkowski (3) during practice on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick answers questions during a news conference on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick talks with strong safety James Ihedigbo (44) during practice on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick answers questions during a news conference on Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, in Indianapolis. The Patriots are scheduled to face the New York Giants in NFL football Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

(AP) ? It's advice that sounds like heresy on the gridiron: Go for it on fourth down. Try more onside kicks. Running backs don't matter much.

But to stats geeks, this is the gospel from the spreadsheets.

The number-savvy economists, statisticians and refugees from Wall Street who revolutionized much of baseball in a way celebrated in the book and movie "Moneyball" are aiming their calculators at football.

But so far they aren't making much headway. The complex team-oriented game is difficult to break down into interchangeable numbers, and the men who run the sport are even tougher to change. If baseball is in the 10th year of adopting "Moneyball" concepts, football is barely in year one, several sports number gurus say.

There is one NFL team that seems to best epitomize an increased amount of number-based decision-making, top sports statisticians agree. And that team, the New England Patriots, will be playing on Super Bowl Sunday for the fifth time in 11 years.

"The Patriots are the 'Moneyball' team of the NFL, no doubt about it," said Brian Burke, founder of Advanced NFL Stats Inc. "The Patriots are in the Super Bowl because they have this system and stick to it. The Giants are in the Super Bowl because they are lucky."

The statisticians are trying to bring mathematics and economics to decisions made on field strategy and player drafting. It's called analytics and in many, but not all, ways it runs counter to decades of football philosophy.

The numbers show that:

? Icing the kicker ? calling a last-second timeout to put more pressure on him ? doesn't work.

? The clich? that defense wins championships is wrong.

? Top first-round draft picks are overvalued compared to picks a bit lower. So says Tobias Moskowitz, a University of Chicago economics professor and co-author of the book "Scorecasting."

Stats guys can spout the numbers proving them right. But when football teams hit the field and general managers compile their rosters, all that doesn't seem to matter. They punt on fourth-and-2 even though they have a 75 percent chance of making a first down. They ice the kicker. And they talk about how it all starts and ends on the defensive side of the line, even though when Moskowitz ran the numbers, the best offense won as many championships as the best defense.

The presence of the Patriots in Sunday's game, and the win by the New Orleans Saints two years ago, show that it's nonsense to say defense wins championships, said Aaron Schatz, founder of Football Outsiders and a pioneer in the young field. "This year is the most offensively focused of all time," he said. "These are the two worst defenses to ever play in the Super Bowl in terms of yards allowed."

Sunday's game also supports another mantra of the numbers geeks: "a running back is a running back is a running back." Shane Reese, a statistics professor at Brigham Young University, said an average-to-good running back with an excellent line works just as well as a superstar running back.

"The running back is an overrated position," he says.

The Patriots and Giants' leading rushers are ranked 27th and 29th in the league in yards gained.

The Patriots are notorious for being close-mouthed. Jack Mula, a former agent who from 1999 to 2008 was general counsel-player personnel for the team, said number crunching is just one part of the Patriots' philosophy. How much, he didn't want to get into.

"Yes, it's a tool, but it's one tool," Mula said. "On the carpenter's belt. It's the one that he should regularly be checking his work against."

Mula said there's far more to decision-making than numbers in the Patriots' way of thinking. While he figures nearly every club uses analytics to some degree, it's the way they use it "that probably separates New England" from most other teams. And if a club isn't crunching the numbers, "to me that explains why they'll forever be in the basement," Mula said.

Boston is a mecca for sports number junkies. The Red Sox, Celtics and Patriots are big into using numbers and every year MIT hosts a conference on it.

And while the Pats win respect for following the numbers guys' advice in trading players for the future, a failed fourth-and-2 attempt at a first down in their own territory a couple of years ago still gets talked about.

Yet that strategy has been studied so frequently that Schatz calls the topic too boring and accepted to talk about.

Moskowitz looked at a decade of about 7,000 fourth-down situations in the NFL. He calculated how often fourth-down attempts are successfully converted. He calculated the results of improved field positions from punts. He looked at the outcome of the decisions. He charted out every position on the field and different yardage situations in most of them ? even fourth-and-5 yards to go ? and it made more statistical sense to go for a first down, he said. And the other stats guys agree wholeheartedly.

Even more than the Patriots, a high school football team in Little Rock, Ark., has embraced football analytics with a passion. Coach Kevin Kelley of Pulaski Academy has gone for it on fourth down more than 500 times since he took over in 2003; getting first downs 49 percent of the time. In the past five years he's only punted five times; but he's also won the state championship twice in those five years and three times in his nine-year tenure.

He figures punting gains a 30-yard advantage in field position, but a 1-in-2 chance of keeping possession of the ball is far more worth it. He also only does onside kicks, but he has a dozen intricately choreographed versions, and gets the ball back about one-quarter of the time. In one game against a powerhouse rival last year, his team scored four touchdowns and led 29-0 after consecutive recovered onside kicks before the other team got the chance to run an offensive play.

When you ask why Kelley doesn't play by "the book," he responds: "Which book are you talking about? The one everyone uses or the one that's right?"

Kelley said many people don't adopt football analytics "because self-preservation kicks in. It's 'I'm worried about my job and I don't want to fight the battle.'"

And Kelley wouldn't mind if other football coaches don't follow his lead: "I have an advantage right now over everybody else."

___

Online:

Football Outsiders http://footballoutsiders.com/

Advanced NFL Stats: http://www.advancednflstats.com/

Scorecasting: http://scorecasting.com/

Pulaski Academy football: http://www.pulaskiacademy.org/football

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/b2f0ca3a594644ee9e50a8ec4ce2d6de/Article_2012-02-03-FBN-Super-Bowl-Analytics/id-e5663fccb1d746acbf1bca9fcb1a6713

nathan hale kohls coupons joe kapp joe kapp kohls target target

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Tips For Planning Your Financial Foreseeable future ? Article ...

The application with the principles of finance to an individual?s or household unit?s monetary decisions is named private finance. There are several aspects to individual finance, and so they include but are not limited to checking and cost savings accounts, bank cards, shopper loans (car loans, mortgage), market investments, retirement plans, and insurance policies.

One of the guidelines which you can follow whenever you go to the retail outlet would be to shop by using a friend. Have them set a time limit as to how long that you are planning to vacation within the retail outlet, which will reduce the chance of you shelling out money on items that you do not need.

Set up web banking and on the web bill pay. Having your accounts and also your bills on the web is actually a fast and effortless strategy to see what you have paid and everything you also have to pay, all-in-one quick and easy part. It needs very little the perfect time to pay and control your bills when they are all-in-one safe location. You won?t lose track of elements as effortlessly.

Whenever you invest, do not place all of your eggs in one basket. Although you may consider the stock is sizzling hot in the moment, if ever the tides change suddenly, you possibly can lose all of your money rapidly. A smarter approach to invest is by diversifying. A diversified portfolio, can assist no matter if financial storms a lot much better.

Hiring a credit repair corporation will help you with some of the legwork involved in cleaning up your credit report, but beware of shady firms that make false or misleading claims. These firms might allege which you can get started fresh using a clean up credit report by making use of an Employee Identification number (EIN) rather than your Societal Safety number. Even so, they neglect to tell you that requesting an EIN on the IRS with this cause is actually a federal crime.

To help you to save income, set up an automatic transfer to your reductions account each pay period. Getting the transfer instantly aids you to definitely get accustomed to the concept of saving. It also prevents frivolous shelling out right before the cash could be saved. You won?t miss that which you don?t see, so automate your savings process today.

Private finance is really a way to address the several utilizes of monetary resources allocated to an individual or household unit. It takes into account the methods in which the monetary sources are obtained, budgeted, saved, or invested with time as well as encompasses the various monetary risks and achievable foreseeable future events.

If you want additional facts about movie times, visit Kale Phoener?s internet site unhesitatingly.

Source: http://companieslist.org/finance/credit/tips-for-planning-your-financial-foreseeable-future/

world aids day horse slaughter horse slaughter world aids day 2011 chester mcglockton chester mcglockton arsenic

Rage-filled video demonstrates Siri's big weakness

thegavin2000/YouTube

By Rosa Golijan

Siri, the virtual assistant built into the iPhone 4S, can be pretty darn helpful (and hilarious) thanks to its voice-recognition capabilities. But unfortunately, it has a big weakness:?Scottish accents.

As a report in the LA Times explains, while?Siri may occasionally struggle with even the most common Midwestern accents,?it is basically helpless when faced with a thick Sottish brogue. Not even speaking extremely slowly seems to allow those who hail from Scotland to communicate with the virtual assistant.

The LA Times' Henry Chu explains that this issue has led a lot of folks to post videos of themselves to "show the world what happens when irresistible accent meets immovable assistant."

One such video???which, according to its description, was inspired by Chu's article?? demonstrates Siri's Scottish weakness in the most hilarious of ways. It was made by Canadian writer and comedian?Gavin McInnes, who is probably best known for being one of the founders of Vice Magazine.

You can take a look at the video clip itself on YouTube. It's hilarious, and well worth embedding, but the number of F-bombs dropped by McInnes?was so great, we felt it best to say "NOT SAFE FOR WORK," and then link out to it.

Related stories:

Want more tech news, silly puns, or amusing links? You'll get plenty of all three if you keep up with Rosa Golijan, the writer of this post, by following her on?Twitter, subscribing to her?Facebook?posts, or circling her?on?Google+.

Source: http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/02/10301199-rage-filled-video-demonstrates-siris-big-weakness

ucla vs usc rich rodriguez rich rodriguez the muppet movie the muppet movie mars rover mars rover

Friday, February 3, 2012

Android OS rules in U.S., gets a Bouncer to keep malware out the Market (Appolicious)

The Android platform expanded its dominance in the U.S. smartphone market during Q4 of 2011, according to the latest ComScore report. Apple may have boosted its share of the mobile handset market with the release of the iPhone 4S, but Android?s still the clear winner in terms of OS use, powering 47.3 percent of surveyed subscribers. That?s up from 44.8 percent last year, growing by slightly more percentage points than Apple?s increase to 29.6 percent from 27.4 percent.

Google gets a bouncer to keep malware out

The rising popularity of Android?s open platform makes it the prime target for malware, and Google?s had quite a time managing mobile threats and consumer expectations around device security. Taking matters into their own hands, Google unveiled an automated system to scan Android apps for potential malware or unauthorized behavior. Codenamed Bouncer, the scanner has been a long time coming, though Hiroshi Lockheimer, vice-president of engineering for Android, said Bouncer?s been in action for months, running unnoticed in the background.

Bouncer scans apps before they even hit the Android Market, looking for known malware including spyware and Trojan horses, as well as behavior that matches malicious apps that have previously been identified. The scanner also features a simulator that runs each app as it if were on an actual Android device, observing the app for ?hidden behavior? and marking it for review if needed. Google already had the ability to re-check published apps in the Market, but Bouncer adds more analytics to the process.

More Market malware?

That historic data analysis has been a necessary tool for mobile security providers like Lookout, enabling them to go so far as to predict how and when malware could affect Android users. And the timing for Google?s Bouncer scanner couldn?t be better, as Symantec just uncovered another malicious Trojan on the Android platform. Dubbed Android.Opfake, this low-risk Trojan sends SMS texts to premium-rate numbers, racking up some serious charges on your phone bill.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/applecomputer/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/appolicious_rss/rss_appolicious_tc/http___www_androidapps_com_articles10951_android_os_rules_in_u_s_gets_a_bouncer_to_keep_malware_out_the_market/44405287/SIG=13mtui3p1/*http%3A//www.androidapps.com/tech/articles/10951-android-os-rules-in-u-s-gets-a-bouncer-to-keep-malware-out-the-market

weight watchers timberwolves office space rawhide bigfoot tony romo twilight zone

Video: January Auto Sales In High Gear

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://video.msnbc.msn.com/cnbc/46226273/

blue angels weather miami angus t. jones belgian malinois girl fight jacoby brissett danielle staub

Thursday, February 2, 2012

US airbase in Germany to host missile shield command (Reuters)

BERLIN (Reuters) ? The command centre for a controversial missile defense shield in Europe will be housed at a U.S. air base in western Germany, a NATO spokesman said on Thursday.

Ramstein Air Base, which already houses the European headquarters of the U.S. Air Force and a NATO installation, will host the centre, which NATO says aims to protect Europe from potential attacks by so-called "rogue states" like Iran.

"The command and control element will be based at Ramstein," the spokesman for NATO's Allied Air Command said. "The implementation of the new command structure will take place in the next two years."

Russia opposes the shield, saying it upsets the balance of power in the region and weakens the deterrent of its nuclear arsenal, calling it a project imposed on allies by Washington.

The shield, which is expected to be fully in place by 2020, will include sites in Spain as well as two former Soviet bloc states, Poland and Romania.

Warsaw fears that planned U.S. defense cuts might stall the development of the anti-missile system on Polish soil and leave it more vulnerable to Russia.

Moscow has said it may take military counter-measures and could deploy Iskander missiles in its Kaliningrad enclave, a region separated from the rest of the country and sitting between NATO members, Poland and Lithuania.

(Reporting by Madeline Chambers, writing by Brian Rohan)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120202/wl_nm/us_germany_shield

chris cooley stevan ridley breast cancer awareness month breast cancer awareness month new ipod touch new ipod touch dwts results

Why the MPAA Should Disappear (And How to Make It Happen)

The Motion Picture Association of America must die. It?s a monopolistic behemoth that poisons creativity and commerce while hiding behind the failed task of educating parents about film content, and the time has come to call for its dissolution.

The above logo is what we, as movie fans, are most familiar with when it comes to the MPAA because we see it on trailers and home video, but that symbol is really a trick of PR. The goal of the MPAA is not to rate movies, even if that?s the product we know and loathe best. The MPAA?s founding, fundamental aim is to maintain the corporate dominance of its members ? the six largest studios.

It does not serve fans. It does not serve families. It does not serve filmmakers.

A Too-Quick History

Unfortunately, it?s always been this way. In 1922, Famous Players-Lasky (the Adolph Zukor-led studio behind the first Best Picture winner, Wings), Metro-Goldwyn, and First National (which would merge with Warner Bros. 6 years later) banded together to create a trade association called the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America. It?s also always had a history of questionable practices. When the organization was 3 years old, it rightfully came under attack from independent filmmakers and the Motion Picture Theater Owners of America. Their problem? The studios had created a trust to help each other hold tight to profits. An extensive report was filed with the Federal Trade Commission, a few changes were made, but nothing was done to stop the MPPDA?s domination.

In 1930, the Big Three, with former Post Master General Will Hays as their head, created the Hays Code which detailed what was acceptable and not acceptable in movies. It was a restraining self-censorship that affected the films being made and being seen by the public. This became their public image ? a morality police for moving art. It just so happened that they owned the studios, so if your movie wasn?t made by their specifications, it didn?t get played.

It wasn?t until 1948, after a name change to how we know them now, that the ruling in United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. applied the Sherman Antitrust Law to break up the monopoly by making it illegal for the film studios to also own the distribution houses. The decision is a vital one, and it injured the industry by taking away an unfair market blocking tool. It should have changed everything, but it didn?t.

A Legal Monopoly

The accusations of 1948 still hold true at their core today. Instead of owning the theaters, the studios create pressures that force the theaters to abide by their rulings (specifically how the revenue will be split between them). This relationship hasn?t been all that public until the massive push-back from the National Theater Owners Association when Universal proclaimed it would make Tower Heist available on Video On Demand just two weeks after opening in theaters. It took that atomic threat to rally NATO together, and it worked, but they are still very much at the mercy of the studios by virtue of the business structure. Without movies, they have nothing to lure people into their high-priced popcorn trap. Legally, the studios are playing by the book, but it?s understood that studios can still survive on home video sales and new platforms (if they figure out how) while movie theaters are at risk of disappearing or at least diminishing significantly. To add pressure, the Blockbuster Mentality delivers a few movies into theaters every year that are must-haves. Imagine if your income depended on making sure your relationship with Warners was solid so you could get reels of The Dark Knight Rises. The lesson? Play nice or perish.

Part of playing nice involves abiding by the MPAA ratings. By and large, the big theater chains agree not to show unrated movies, the studios stay happy, and the control continues. That control also extends out to filmmakers. The MPAA has always maintained that their ratings system is voluntary, but filmmakers submit their movies voluntarily the same way someone getting mugged hands over their money. It?s a simple equation: The MPAA controls the ratings, the big movie chains won?t play anything that?s unrated, so if you want your movie to screen in a bigger market, you?ve got to knock on the MPAA?s door and submit to their judgement.

And who controls the MPAA? The studios. According to the MPAA website, its purpose is to:

?champion the creative and artistic freedoms of filmmakers, while working to rally public and private institutions around the world to the cause of safeguarding intellectual property rights, advancing technology-driven innovation, and opening markets to the uniquely powerful and increasingly global medium of film.

Throughout its history and into the modern era, MPAA?s core mission has remained the same ? to advance the business and the art of filmmaking and its enjoyment around the world.?

Just below those flowery words? The logos of Disney, Paramount, Sony, Fox, Universal and Warners. This isn?t a true representation of filmmakers ? it?s a representation of the biggest and wealthiest that works stridently to protect those economic interests through market-controlling tactics. It?s not that the studios have the MPAA in their pockets. It?s that the studios are the MPAA. It?s the schoolboy writing the questions on the exam. When an outside filmmaker knocks on that door for a rating, they?re knocking on a door financed by six studios that have a vested interest in quelling competition.

That?s why it?s incorrect to think of the MPAA ratings as self-policing. It?s not an industry looking out for its consumers ? it?s a conglomerate of the wealthiest companies deciding what rules everyone in the business has to abide by. It?s rule by the few, and you won?t be seeing the MPAA sending out applications to join them any time soon. Hell, even a powerful force like The Weinstein Company isn?t allowed to play.

But if the MPAA is a trade association, isn?t that legal?

That?s a tricky question. To answer it, here?s attorney James Kopecky: ?Trade associations (especially the MPAA) exhibit textbook anti-competitive behavior and should be labelled as trusts that violate trade laws. ?But, they can skirt by in certain areas that allow them to avoid such labels.?

Those loopholes, according to Kopecky, include:

  1. The MPAA being ?separate? from the studios because they?re not direct employees.
  2. Even though the studios are paying for the MPAA, they?re doing so under the auspice of protecting the industry and not individual interests.
  3. The major studios can still consider each other competition.
  4. They aren?t price-fixing or controlling what types of movies are made.

In common sense terms:

  1. Even though the studios give them all their money, the MPAA employees are not paid directly by them.
  2. While the MPAA lobbies the government and represents the interests of the studios, those are somehow also the direct interests of all filmmakers.
  3. The Big Six still face off when they release movies, even while they?re all one team behind the MPAA.
  4. The first part is true, but while they don?t control what gets made, they help control what gets shown in theaters.

Creative Differences

To outline all of the examples where independent filmmakers were slighted by the MPAA while the studios were given preference (since the MPAA is the studios) would take far too many words. Plus, no one can sum up the core problems quite like Matt Stone and Trey Parker talking about South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut:

There are no objective rules, leading to a nebulous ratings system spearheaded by a group of anonymous parents. When Jack Valenti became chairman of the MPAA in 1966, he created the new ratings system as a direct response to the emerging crop of new filmmakers during the New Hollywood era, but that welcomed change has turned out to be a wolf in bureaucrat?s clothing. It?s the movie industry version of Don?t Ask Don?t Tell ? purporting to sidestep a problem of censorship instead of solving it while still placing that regulatory power in the hands of the people the system is meant to regulate.

He also specifically wanted parents to decide how movies would be rated, but there are myriad problems with that set up (even with as democratic as it appears to be). First of all, the anonymous and insular nature of the process means that the MPAA is heavily guarded against real oversight. That?s not to say that there is any malfeasance going on in their hallowed halls, but their structure facilitates the possibility that corruption could be as normal as lunch at noon, and no one from the outside world ? that?s greatly effected by the MPAA decisions ? would ever know.

Secondly, the ratings board of ?normal? parents from Los Angeles is of the same mind considering their track record on judging scenes of homosexual sex and their grand pass on violence. They?re also presumably in the same age range with no one close to be under 40 years old. Perhaps it?s a sampling problem: when you ask for people to come judge the morality of art, you get a certain type of person volunteering. Regardless, it?s yielded some unsavory decisions that ? yet again ? prove advantageous to the larger studios who trade in mass-market, mostly uncontroversial filmmaking while leaving independent and foreign filmmakers outside of the lobby in the cold.

Examples of the double standard abound and were gracefully explored in Kirby Dick?s This Film is Not Yet Rated. The biggest recent example of obvious bias came with Black Swan (released by Fox Searchlight) and Blue Valentine (an independent distributed by The Weinstein Company). The one with ties to the MPAA got an R-rating. The one without, got an NC-17. This, despite no quantitative difference between two scenes of oral sex. In the end, The Weinstein Company successfully got the MPAA to change the rating, which is great, but also proves that their ratings system is arbitrary to begin with.

This also happened around the same time that David Schwimmer?s Trust was bizarrely slapped with an NC-17 for a scene that involved implied sexuality and zero nudity. Compare that with a movie like, say, Forgetting Sarah Marshall (from MPAA member Universal) which got an R-rating with sexual content and graphic nudity. The argument is not whether each film deserved a certain rating; the argument is that there should be clear guidelines in place that apply evenly to both studio and independent movies. That?s currently not the case, and it?s economically advantageous to the studios.

In general, as the anecdote in that Stone/Parker clip revealed, studios are given an easier time navigating the MPAA because 1) they tend to make the movies the MPAA finds ethically clean and 2) they, you know, own the MPAA.

As a small aside, judging art ethically comes with a peculiar unintended consequence. With the MPAA getting more and more detailed in how they describe the possibly offensive content, they deliver massive spoilers for movies. Landon Palmer recently joked with me about them ruining a key scene in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo by spoiling it right under their rating. The irony in all of this is that we?re supposed to be upset by the scene, but the MPAA recognizes its potential to upset, and publicizes it in an effort to keep viewers ?safe.?

Digressions notwithstanding, the third problem with having parents decide how movies should be rated is that parents have no idea what might really be harmful to children ? at least not on that large a scale. It?s imperative that parents be armed with the tools that will help them decide what content should and should not be seen by their offspring (personal responsibility is key), but does that mean other parents should make the determinations and classifications? Probably not.

To that point, Barbara J. Wilson, PhD makes a strong case for child psychologists and child behavior specialists weighing in on the subject. What would research-guided standards dictate? In several cases, rules that would counter to how the MPAA makes its decisions now. For example, it would consider the context of violence and not simply the amount of it. It?s a more vibrant system which could lead to more nuanced rules that could be converted into a truly workable system that doesn?t depend on the type of day that one of the ratings board members is having.

The Final SOPA Straw

Beyond their monopolistic tendencies of market control and inability to simply provide parents with meaningful content information without 1) de facto dictating it or 2) issuing too-detailed accounts of what?s in the movie before we see the movie, the MPAA and its chairman Chris Dodd overplayed their hand in a way that rightfully incensed the public with their concept for and pressure to create SOPA. It was a bill intentionally designed to injure freedom on the internet so that the major studios could more easily hunt down piracy ? a phenomenon which demonstrably hurts indie filmmakers but hasn?t been shown to hurt the bottom line of the Big Six. Now, it?s certainly plausible to theorize that profits are diminished, but it doesn?t help their cause when the MPAA publishes falsified/grossly incorrect data on piracy?s effect on sales.

Dodd?s infantile rant after SOPA and PIPA went down in a flame war should be a clear enough message to everyone that the MPAA has one core principle, and it doesn?t involve expanding creative freedom for artists, it doesn?t involve supporting or growing audiences, and it doesn?t involve aiding anyone who doesn?t pay the light bills in their building.

Possible Solutions to a Difficult Problem

The problem of the MPAA is two-fold.

  1. The group is too closely connected to the major studios.
  2. The ratings system is unfair and used to control market practices in a biased way.

The possible solutions for this are obvious: either dissolve the MPAA and strike it down as an illegal trust or shift control of the ratings system over to an uninterested third party not funded by those who directly benefit from their rulings. It?s simple, but incredibly difficult because we, as movie fans, have zero power over the MPAA or the studios. Which raises a big question.

So What Do We Do Now?

Unfortunately, there isn?t much we can do. That?s the difficult position we?re in. Back to James Kopecky for even worse news:

?Labeling [the MPAA as] a trust is going to be even harder now that Citizen?s United survived Supreme Court review. ?If a corporation can use the free speech and free expression protections of the First Amendment to donate money to political candidates, then I have to believe they will eventually use the same case to ensure free association protection from the First Amendment as well. ?If a corporation is a person, and people can freely associate with whoever they chose, provided they don?t explicitly break any laws, then a corporation should be able to do the same thing.?

That?s no good. Plus, since the MPAA is a private entity with no legal ties to the government, they?re untouchable unless a lawsuit is brought against them by 1) someone who has been injured by their practices, and has 2) a discerning lawyer who can gain legal access to the MPAA?s internal documents to show 3) compelling evidence that they?ve severely, disproportionately favored the studios that keep their doors open over independent filmmakers including the one that brings the suit. That?s a tall order.

What we can do is not much, but sometimes your only course of action is the right course of action. Recently, a Texas man named Michael L. started a White House petition to have Dodd investigated for his comments on Fox News regarding political candidates not looking for their large donation checks if they weren?t going to help the entertainment industry on SOPA. It currently has over 31,000 signatures on it with more still coming in.

It?s a fine model to utilize, so we?ve started a petition through the White House system to call for an investigation into the MPAA for violations of anti-trust laws. It makes no sense that an insular group using market pressures and tools like the ratings system to stifle competitors can both purport to speak for the entire filmmaking industry and to claim that it?s a legal trade association.

It?s a wild card move, and it?s a Hail Mary play to be sure, but it?s the only move left on the board for the unwashed masses that simply love watching movies. Even though legally we?re barred from making any real noise, we still have a dog in this fight. The decisions and actions of the MPAA affect us just as they affect the livelihoods and potential growth of independent filmmakers.

If you agree, please sign the petition. Share it with friends. Share with enemies that happen to agree with you on this. Share it with your grandmother. If our voice is loud enough, it might just be heard.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1924420/news/1924420/

when does daylight savings time end world series mvp rocky horror picture show risky business weather nj weather nj nyc weather

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

NYPD cop shot in head, to make full recovery

AP Photo/Mayor's Office, Kristen Artz

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, speaking at a news conference, holds a jar containing the bullet removed from Officer Kevin Brennan's head.

By NBCNewYork

A New York City police officer is expected to make a full recovery after being shot in the head while chasing a suspect in Brooklyn, authorities said.

Officer Kevin Brennan, 29, remains in critical but stable condition at Bellevue Hospital following an emergency surgery Tuesday night in which doctors removed a bullet from his skull.

For more, visit NBCNewYork.com

"It could have turned out an awful lot worse, and I think it's just another example of the men and women out in the streets every day and every night, trying to keep us safe," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said at a hospital news briefing Tuesday evening.

The suspect in the shooting, 21-year-old Louis "Baby" Ortiz, was apprehended on Bushwick Avenue at about 11:30 p.m. following a massive manhunt in the area.

The situation unfolded when officers were called to the Bushwick Houses public housing project? at about 9 p.m. for shots fired, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said at the briefing.

Three officers, including Brennan, saw three suspects running from the building, Kelly said. The officers ran after the individuals, with Brennan in the lead.

Brennan followed one of the suspects into the back of 370 Bushwick Ave., said Kelly. Inside the building, the man turned and fired a shot at the officer, striking him at the base of the his skull.

Brennan fired a shot in return, but it was not known whether the suspect was hit, Kelly said.

The suspect, Ortiz, was known to police, said Kelly. One of the officers chasing him had arrested him in the past. Ortiz was additionally wanted for questioning in a New Year's Day homicide.

Brennan was rushed to Bellevue Hospital, where trauma surgeons performed emergency surgery on him in the emergency room. The NYPD's chief surgeon, Dr. Eli Kleinman, said the bullet entered the back of the officer's head and was stopped by a thick portion of bone in the skull.

The officer was in critical but stable condition Tuesday night.

"He is one lucky young man,"?said Kelly, observing that the doctors did a "phenomenal" job in removing the bullet from Brennan's head.

"He's cognizant of what's going on," added Bloomberg, who said Brennan recognized him and Kelly as they were at his bedside with his family. The officer was in and out of consciousness due to painkillers but was otherwise expected to make a recovery, the mayor said.

Brennan is a six-year NYPD veteran and a new father, according to Bloomberg. His wife, Janet, gave birth to their daughter six weeks ago.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

Source: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/01/10287851-nypd-cop-is-shot-in-the-head-expected-to-make-full-recovery

mark ingram between two ferns joe the plumber weather colorado springs weather colorado springs chaz bono tonight show

Stocks down, trying for best January since '97

In this Jan. 30, 2012 photo, specialists Mark Otto, left, and Christopher Malloy work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Markets clawed back lost ground Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012, on hopes that Greece is heading toward a conclusion of debt-reduction talks with private creditors and that it may secure its second bailout package this week. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

In this Jan. 30, 2012 photo, specialists Mark Otto, left, and Christopher Malloy work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Markets clawed back lost ground Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012, on hopes that Greece is heading toward a conclusion of debt-reduction talks with private creditors and that it may secure its second bailout package this week. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

(AP) ? The stock market lost ground Tuesday but still appeared headed for its best January finish in more than a decade. An unexpected drop in consumer confidence dragged stocks down after a strong open.

The Dow Jones industrial average was down 37 points at 12,617 just after 1 p.m. EST. The Standard & Poor's 500 was down a point at 1,311. The Nasdaq composite index was down a point at 2,811.

For the month, the S&P 500 is up 4.3 percent. That would be its best performance to start a year since a 6.1 percent gain in January 1997. Last year, the market added 2.3 percent in the first month.

Investors had such low expectations for the economy after a tough 2011 that it was easy for reports in January to come in better than expected, said Jerry Harris, chief investment strategist at the brokerage Sterne Agee.

"I don't see anything really glamorous or tremendous about the economy or earnings," Harris said. "But I think they're very acceptable, and things are grinding along."

The Dow closed at 12,217.56 at the end of last year, then started this year with a pop ? a gain of 179.82 points on opening day. It was the kind of big swing investors became accustomed to in 2011.

Since then, it's been a quiet ascent: 19 days in a row, counting Tuesday, of moves of less than 100 points. The last time the Dow had such a placid stretch was a 34-day run that started Dec. 3, 2010.

The Dow started the day up 66 points after encouraging signs from Europe that Greece might finally complete a deal to cut its crushing debt, a step toward securing a critical ?130 billion bailout payment.

Greece is negotiating with investors who bought its government bonds. They are expected to swap their bonds for new ones with half the face value, plus a lower interest rate and longer term of maturity.

Investors are increasingly worried that Portugal may need a similar deal with its private creditors. European leaders insist the Greek reduction is a one-time event. Portugal's borrowing costs have risen to record highs.

Back home in the United States, investors have enjoyed a steady climb through January amid signs of an improving economy. Unemployment has fallen from a 10 percent peak in October 2009 to 8.5 percent.

The Dow lost its gains after the Conference Board reported that its consumer confidence index fell to 61.1 in January, down from 64.8 in December. Economists had expected 68.

There were also signs that the housing market continues to struggle. Home prices fell in November for a third straight month in in 19 of the 20 cities tracked by the S&P/Case-Shiller index. The biggest declines were in Atlanta, Chicago and Detroit.

Eight of the 10 major categories in the S&P 500 were lower for the day. Telecommunications stocks and financial stocks managed small gains.

Avery Dennison Corp., which makes labels and packaging materials, was among the worst performers in the S&P, down 5 percent, after it said earnings plunged 81 percent on nearly flat sales. Its 2012 outlook was well below Wall Street expectations.

Among other stocks in the news:

? RadioShack Corp. stock plummeted 28 percent. The company said it earned 11 cents to 13 cents per share for the quarter that ended in December. That's down from 51 cents a year earlier and less than half what Wall Street was expecting.

? Mattel Inc. soared 6 percent because of strong demand for Barbie and Monster High dolls during the holidays. That boosted Mattel's fourth-quarter profit by a better-than-expected 14 percent. The company also raised its dividend.

? U.S. Steel Corp. gained 4 percent after it reported strong demand for pipes from the oil industry from October through December. The company was also optimistic about this quarter.

? Agriculture conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland declined 4 percent after it reported an 89 percent drop in quarterly net income. The company said its results were weighed down by weakness in oilseeds, corn processing and agricultural services.

___

AP Business Writer Stan Choe contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-01-31-Wall%20Street/id-7aa1dfd22f8a41138f21aa1acb07174b

60 minutes oobleck justin timberlake marine corps ball frank gore injury frank gore injury makana makana